Where are we now? by Matterlurgy

Today we visited neuroscientists Aman Saleem and Matteo Carandini at The Institute of Ophthalmology. We were introduced to methods and practices from their research that focused upon navigation and cognitive mapping. The main content of our discussions centred upon the ‘hippocampus’ – a region deep within the brain that resembles a seahorse.  It plays a vital role in how both humans and mammals navigate through space, in addition to both short and long term memory function. As a multi-sensual area of the brain it differs from the visual cortex that has a more singular visual pursuit, offering a reception for sensory input that gives recognition but not clarity as to what we are seeing. The hippocampus is a plural, multi-sensory region in the brain accommodating a dualistic appreciation of place: the point we are physically located in and the place we may be relating to at a distance. Like the blue dot on Google maps, it resembles a pulsing area where the process and production of where we are, or think we are in the present is activated.

But where are we now? [1] This deceptively simple question has opened up many trajectories for us. Where are we in terms of physical space? Political or ecological contexts? Subjective and collective identities? What happens between the here and there when binaries collapse? What errors, frictions and fictions may emerge?


The Anthropocence is the current condition that underwrites such broad questioning. The term, coined by scientists, [2] marks out a new geological epoch. It is an umbrella within which to describe how the human (anthropos) has become irrecoverably grafted into every aspect of global-techno-animal life. Its consequences are read primarily through the current climate and ecological crisis. It also speaks towards the impact of advanced capitalism and our relationship to non-human agents – from animals to rocks. It is debated that we have been in this ‘now’ since the industrial revolution, perhaps even further back [3]. Alternative hybrid formations of the term, pinning specific areas of inquiry, have also been proposed (See: Braidotti ‘Capitaloscene’; Haraway ‘Chthulucene’; Parikka ‘Anthrobscene’).

Within this matrix of connections and contexts we want to ignite a set of opening questions: can the hippocampus provide a methodology to navigate the present within archival collections? Is it possible to way-find between the here and there? What repetitions and differences might we discover? What possible fictions and futures may emerge in the errors and glitches along the way?

By Helena Hunter and Mark Peter Wright: http://matterlurgy.tumblr.com


[1] We are reluctant to speak of a ‘we’ in terms of one homogenised collection of (human) people. When ‘we’ is evoked in our writing we are talking from our subjective and relational positions firstly, but also wish to extend a sense of connectivity and agency to non-human species and phenomena.

[2] Crutzen, Paul J. (2002) Geology of Mankind. In: “Nature” 415, p. 23.

[3] See: Lewis, S.L & Maslin, M.A. (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. In: “Nature” 519, 171–180.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s